On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 08:26 -0400, James Laska wrote: > Would it make better sense to stuff this into firstboot to shorten the > number of installer screens? I'm not sure what the rule is in terms of > what goes into anaconda versus what goes into firstboot. Should > anaconda be concerned *only* with packages, while firstboot deals > strictly with post-install configuration (adding users, firewall, clock, > addition package sources (yum, up2date)? Might be the case that this is > a larger issue to be discussed at a later date. The place where this gets difficult is on arches like s390, s390x and iSeries where you don't really have a head to speak of and thus firstboot is a bit ugly to depend on. Not sure what the right direction for these arches is... Jeremy -- Fedora-config-list mailing list Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list