Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 05:35 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> Would an add/remove rather than textbox for additional services make better
> sense? In which case should we have a predefined list of more well known
> services, with addition of custom ports (possibly with descriptive text or
> just showing both port and service name from /etc/services).

That's sort of the direction the anaconda screen has moved in.  I
haven't quite gone to the point of adding arbitrary ones, but it's not
difficult to do.

> I wonder if we will want to have better "service definition" for 
> service publishing via howl.

Eventually, yes.

Jeremy


-- 
Fedora-config-list mailing list
Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]