Re: HIG-ification of tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Knutson wrote:
Had a couple of questions...

1) I don't want to seem impatient, but could someone at RH take a look
at my s-c-httpd patch here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110494


The reason I ask is that the patch ended up being huge, despite minor
changes, and I wanted to know if I'm doing something wrong, or if it's
just because of what looks like different whitespace between the two
Glade files.  I don't want to keep working on this stuff if I'm doing it
the wrong way. :)

2) Are any of the tools, besides s-c-packages, which are due for a big
UI overhaul soon?  If this is the case, I'd hate to put the time in on
some packages only to discover that they don't matter anymore.  Any
hints on this would be fantastic - once I get an answer on both of these
questions, I can start cranking out HIG-ification patches for the s-c
tools!


Hi Jens!


Sorry, but i hadn't had time yet to look at the patch and fixes, but will do so either today (it's on top of my priority list atm :-).

As soon as i've reviewed it i'll comment in bugzilla if/what i applied from it.

Thanks again!

Read ya, Phil

--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Development | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <phil@xxxxxxxxx>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart | Motd: Better be root than to reboot. %^)
main(d,o){char **t=o;for(t++,d=o=2e3;--d;o%d?o:--d?d=--o:--**t?d=--o:printf("%d ",o)?*++*t?d=o=2e3:d++:o);}





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]