On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 12:04, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Brent Fox wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 11:02, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Brent Fox (bfox@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > Other than that, I don't know of any tools that are going to be changing > > > > very much. Hwbrowser could probably use some reworking, but it's not > > > > critical. > > > > > > The issue with hwbrowser is that it could probably use a complete > > > rewrite, including the backend it uses (use the HAL?), so I'm not > > > sure that tweaking it's UI makes sense without a larger plan. > > > > Agreed. hwbrowser in it's current form is not really useful. > > What about serviceconf? Perhaps it would be replaced in a couple > of releases. Should the name change first? What's wrong with serviceconf? FWIW, serviceconf was renamed to redhat-config-services a long time ago. It will need to be renamed again to system-config-services. --Brent