Hi,
Mo I would prefer a IRC hackfest for it, maybe we should set up one. We was in the past really fast with developing ideas and move them forward with this method.2013/11/14 Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 11/14/2013 06:41 AM, Adam Saunders wrote:I think this is definitely worth a try, to give each a distinctive look
> While we could use different colours to differentiate the products, I
> think sticking with the same/similar shades of blue of the Fedora logo
> could be more effective. It might better illustrate that the products
> are all part of the Fedora project.
while keep blue the common color - we can see if it works.
Well, the galloping stallion is actually a mark / badge / insignia, not
> The Ford example also sounds good; Ford cars all have a common logo with
> differentiating sublogos. However, there can be striking differences
> between those sublogos: the Ford Mustang's is a galloping stallion,
> while the Ford Taurus's is a sharp word mark. While the Starbucks visual
> brand language has many clear commonalities, Ford automobile sublogos
> look very different from each other.
the logo. On the website and official brochures (I can speak to the
latter because I own a Ford and was recently at the dealer for a tune up
:) ) the 'MUSTANG' logo is written out in the same font as the other
cars' logos. But I am glad you pointed that out because that might be a
point of confusion in our analogy; we might need to find a better one
when explaining this.
We definitely want clear commonalities between any marks or visual
identity graphics we create for the different products!
This is a good point; I think though, we'll probably find the
> I guess my point is: I think we should add these questions to the list
> to ask the working groups:
>
> (5) To what extent is your product different from
> the other products in the Fedora.next initiative?
>
> (6) To what extent is your product similar to the other
> products in the Fedora.next initiative?
>
> These may be somewhat trivial-sounding questions, but getting a sense of
> how the working groups see their product in relation to the other
> Fedora.next products could help to better establish a common branding
> framework.
differences clear through the answers to their other questions maybe?
Mainly, the 'what problem does it solve' question should differentiate
them enough do you think?
~m
_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
--
make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
