On 07/07/2010 03:55 PM, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 08:42 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 09:48:11AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: >>> I would >>> *never* recommend that to a newbie or non-security conscious user (as >>> the designers are presumed to be). So we must have SELinux installed and >>> active by default. >> >> I think these changes are due to both the excellent maintenance of >> policy by Dan Walsh and others, and also more effective communication >> about the benefits of SELinux. >> > I'd second that. I remember some years ago SELinux on desktop was > practically unusable -- lots of problems, applications stopping to work > because of it -- but now, I have SELinux turned on in enforcing mode and > everything works without issues. One thing that bugs me though, is that > the troubleshoot applet is slow like hell (and I still have some > wrongly-labeled directories from the olden times which I slowly relabel > anytime a SELinux denial pops up...) :-D So we have an agreement SELinux must stay on the spin. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
