On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:47:39PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > On 07/21/2009 07:40 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 06:31:44PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > >> > >> Those are made by Red Hat employees as part of their regular job, so > >> automatically fail under CLA. I think a bit of research (but I am not > >> thrilled about doing it myself) of the RPMs from those release will > >> reveal a GPL license. But IANAL and i don't work for Red Hat... (we can > >> try a shortcut and ask spot) > > > > I think you meant "fall" instead of "fail"! It did give me a chuckle > > ROTFLMAO! the spell checker failed me. again! > > > though. But yes, these contributions to Fedora should fall under a > > license that allows reuse, redistribution, and remixes, although I > > suspect it's not Creative Commons. > > Fair enough. But I think we may do something to change their license to > something usable (CC). If the relicense to CC for documentation/wiki is > possible, I expect it has to be possible for wallpapers. Should I ask > Spot about this? Yes, I'd bring this issue to fedora-legal-list so it's documented for reference later. Thanks for bringing this up, Nicu. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
