On 07/21/2009 07:40 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 06:31:44PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: >> >> Those are made by Red Hat employees as part of their regular job, so >> automatically fail under CLA. I think a bit of research (but I am not >> thrilled about doing it myself) of the RPMs from those release will >> reveal a GPL license. But IANAL and i don't work for Red Hat... (we can >> try a shortcut and ask spot) > > I think you meant "fall" instead of "fail"! It did give me a chuckle ROTFLMAO! the spell checker failed me. again! > though. But yes, these contributions to Fedora should fall under a > license that allows reuse, redistribution, and remixes, although I > suspect it's not Creative Commons. Fair enough. But I think we may do something to change their license to something usable (CC). If the relicense to CC for documentation/wiki is possible, I expect it has to be possible for wallpapers. Should I ask Spot about this? -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/ photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/ my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/ _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
