Nicu Buculei wrote: > Máirín Duffy wrote: >> I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package. >> It looks like this on a dark blue background: >> http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/temp/fedoralogo_white_shaded2.png >> >> this is what will be packaged though: >> http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/temp/fedoralogo_white_shaded.png >> >> Is this something that will work against the background >> Charlie? (If not I can try a few tricks to make it stand out) >> >> I asked spot to have it install at: >> /usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-logo-fancy.png >> >> What do you think? > > Indeed, they are fancy, but will you change the logo guidelines to allow > them? Right now I approve this on a case-by-case basis (the one Ray sent me though, I'm not sure where it comes from but it was never submitted for approval) I think rather than changing the guidelines, what we should do is decide on one we like and just make it a standard that is part of the guidelines and shipped in the logo packs we send out. I think there is too much room for error for bad gradients so we should just say, don't do it unless you use this one kind of thing. What do you think? ~m _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
