----- "Nicu Buculei" <nicu_fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Charlie Brej wrote: > > Nicu Buculei wrote: > >> From my understanding, it's both. > >> It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed > > >> also GPLv2+ > > > > I just wanted the two images dual licensed under GPLv2. The rest can > > > stay as CC-BY-SA which (AFAIK) is a better licence for artwork. > > The best option is dual license, both CC-BY-SA and GPL, otherwise you > > can go in murky waters: the GPL talks about the source code, and what > is > the source fode for those two images? The layered .xcf. > So having a consistent (dual) license is the easiest way. Ok, sounds good for me. So I'm going to use multiple licenses for solar-kde-theme. CC-BY-SA for artwork and GPLv2 for source code of themes (it's inherited work from original KDM theme). Thanks! R. > > -- > nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com > Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ > Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org > my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-art-list mailing list > Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
