Re: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Charlie Brej wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
 From my understanding, it's both.
It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed also GPLv2+

I just wanted the two images dual licensed under GPLv2. The rest can stay as CC-BY-SA which (AFAIK) is a better licence for artwork.

The best option is dual license, both CC-BY-SA and GPL, otherwise you can go in murky waters: the GPL talks about the source code, and what is the source fode for those two images? The layered .xcf.
So having a consistent (dual) license is the easiest way.

--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

_______________________________________________
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Development]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux