On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 16:32 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > Am I completely wrong that "For Intel-compatible PCs" is better for the > > users to whom we're handing these out? If we were to make special > > 64-bit covers, I'd suggest "For 64-bit PCs." The number of 64-bit > > machines is steadily growing in the USA but the people who typically ask > > specifically for 64-bit don't need to be told what they have. On the > > other hand, the only way to accommodate people who *don't* know is to > > give them the standard 32-bit version, and they don't need to know the > > difference. > > Well, probably the AMD fanboys are not that happy with spelling "Intel"... > > Note: for the time being I run mostly Intel machines, but I still am an > AMD fanboy at heart and understand why spelling "Intel" *may* be better > for newbies (which newbies should be educated by someone). Good point. We can't really say just "PCs" either thanks to Apple's switch to Intel CPUs. -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
