On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:30 -0400, Jarod Wen wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Thanks for your comment. In fact the sentence has been changed back to > be "i686 Live CD" to conform to the names in the download page of live > cd. Please find the new version from the top of the list. The names on the download page should be changed, not your cover. For a while now we've needed to make those pages more accessible to non-techies, and Mo had made a very attractive new draft for that purpose: http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/webdesign/get-fedora/ I notice that her draft also includes "i686" but I think that we really should be eliminating jargon as much as possible. I'll bring that up on the Websites list as a follow-on, since I didn't notice it earlier. Am I completely wrong that "For Intel-compatible PCs" is better for the users to whom we're handing these out? If we were to make special 64-bit covers, I'd suggest "For 64-bit PCs." The number of 64-bit machines is steadily growing in the USA but the people who typically ask specifically for 64-bit don't need to be told what they have. On the other hand, the only way to accommodate people who *don't* know is to give them the standard 32-bit version, and they don't need to know the difference. -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
