On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:41 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > Only 22x22, even 16x16 seems crisp (maybe 32x32 is also a bit blurry, > but being larger it seems OK). > Well, the main difference between >= 22x22 and 16x16 is the used type of projection, which makes the 16x16 easier to make crisp. I'll recheck the 22x22 to see how I can improve it. > BTW, speaking of comparing various icon sizes, have you seen jimmac's > screencast about "one canvas workflow"? > http://jimmac.musichall.cz/log/?p=436 > > If so, what opinion have you about this, as you have a lot of experience > working with icons, could it be of benefit or the [possible] benefits > does not compensate for the additional work? > I haven't. When I first tried to play it I was on Rawhide and it was sure way to bring my browser down. I didn't tried it since then, but I'll probably look at it to see what it's about... Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
