On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 10:08 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > 2008/6/26 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Legal rejected all the codenames for the Fedora 10 release, other than > > "Red Hat Linux," that we sent in the top ten short list on which the > > Board voted. > > Can we get a summary from Legal on why the names were rejected? If they're rejected, it's usually because there's a name collision with an existing product that's close enough to Fedora that it's too risky to use. It's not because of general unease or fiat. :-) I'm trying not to generate too much pushback to Legal right now because they are helping us with a number of other issues right now. Does this answer help at all? -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
