On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 14:31 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > What are the outstanding issues with Mist/gnome-icon-theme that makes it > a target for replacement? > The application coverage is pretty good (full coverage in key > applications such as Firefox, Rhythmbox, Pidgin, Gimp, OpenOffice etc.) > and looks good together with the rest of the Fedora desktop elements. > The development is largely done upstream in GNOME (bugzilla and IRC > mostly), so therefore the development might seem a bit silent to the > Fedora community. Let me know if there is any way I can improve that. > - Andreas > None, there just seems to be people like me or Luya who thinks having our own icon set would be good to have in Fedora and are willing to work on it. And due to the "work with upstream" nature of Fedora it could also help to pave way for other icon theme developers (we won't patch applications to hardcode Echo icons instead of their own, rather work with the devs to fix their applications so they would use icons from selected icon theme, if available). I believe in this area it is desired to join forces with Mist/gnome-icon-theme/Tango/Oxygen developers :) Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
