-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martin Sourada wrote: >>> Also, during the review I have done for Echo icons, I have found that >>> some applications do not install their icons into the hicolor icon theme >>> while they are recommended to do so [2]. >> 22x22 is just a really bad idea, since it breaks everybody who follows >> the earlier recommendation to install a 48x48, which scales down nicely >> to 24x24. Also in the age of rising dpi, it doesn't make much sense to >> make icons even smaller... >> > > And therefore enforces the creation of smaller sizes which is good, > because not every icon that looks good at 48x48 is good at 24x24 - there > are four times less pixels... I don't know whether making smaller icons > makes sense or not, but the trend is here and I think we should follow > it. Tango does this, Gnome as well, why we should differ? I am no UI expert, but from a maintainability perspective, if we were ascertain the sizes that we would like to use, wouldn't that work out better in the long run? I mean, a 22x22 as well as a 24x24 sounds like a maintenance nightmare to me. Is there a sound reasoning why we have both of them? later, Rogue > > Thanks, > Martin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG7ux8ceS9IQvx51YRAkp7AJ9PtZJuxinZKP1lVomilU0hh222JQCguTvf AXq3TSglSyvV9OCtrKWgaRI= =Pxuj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
