On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 19:53 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:51 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you add > > > > > > gtk-icon-sizes="panel-foobar=24,24:panel-menu=24,24" > > > > > > to your ~/.gtkrc-2.0 and try again ? Does it look better ? > > > > > > > So, this helps for apps that only install a 48x48 app icon, > > like gthumb, but it makes the situation worse for the places > > where we actually have a 22x22 icon, like file-roller, or the > > various preference menus. The 22 vs 24 problem should really > > be fixed, one way or the other. > > > > > In tango icon theme guidelines [1] it is mentioned that the 22x22 size > is preferred and gnome also seems to be heading this way, so I'd be > inclined to solve it this way (i.e. creating 22x22 icons where missing). > > Also, during the review I have done for Echo icons, I have found that > some applications do not install their icons into the hicolor icon theme > while they are recommended to do so [2]. 22x22 is just a really bad idea, since it breaks everybody who follows the earlier recommendation to install a 48x48, which scales down nicely to 24x24. Also in the age of rising dpi, it doesn't make much sense to make icons even smaller... _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
