On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:34 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Gah, I should have mentioned before; here is the usual split for > packaging themes: > > - engine goes in a separate package, together with the default theme > for that engine > > - the metacity and metatheme go in another package, I don't care > too much if you split that up further > > Ray is supposed to write an email about the artwork repackaging he has > been doing on redhat-artwork recently, I don't know if he ended up doing > separate packages for metacity themes. In any case, I'll poke Ray to > send that mail, and then it would be good to follow the same pattern. > > Splitting the engine part off is important, because the rest can be > noarch (and is often large, think icon themes) > > > Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-art-list mailing list > Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list Hm... I see the point... I wonder, if I split the metacity and metatheme into subpackages, can the engine package be arch specific, and subpackages noarch?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
