> Yes. I would prefer a RPM package for testing changes. Have you done any > benchmarks to see how well it performs compared to the default theme? > > http://www.manucornet.net/pub/olpc/gtk-theme-torturer.tgz > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/GTK_for_OLPC#GTK_theme.2Fengine_torturer_and_crash_tester > > Better or atleast equivalent performance is important. > > Rahul > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-art-list mailing list > Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list As for the rpm. I've just created it [1]. As for the performance - I tested only metacity theme, I don't know how to do benchmark on gtk theme, but Daniel says murrine engine is faster then clearlooks. Here are the results for metacity: $ metacity-theme-viewer Clearlooks Loaded theme "Clearlooks" in 0.01 seconds Drew 100 frames in 0.17 client-side seconds (1.7 milliseconds per frame) and 0.324083 seconds wall clock time including X server resources (3.24083 milliseconds per frame) $ metacity-theme-viewer Nodoka Loaded theme "Nodoka" in 0.01 seconds Drew 100 frames in 0.08 client-side seconds (0.8 milliseconds per frame) and 0.141556 seconds wall clock time including X server resources (1.41556 milliseconds per frame) Martin References: [1] http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC7/i386/nodoka-0.3-1.fc7.noarch.rpm
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
