O/H Máirín Duffy έγραψε: > There is a definite tension between creative treatments of the logo and > misuses of the logo that potentially damage the Fedora brand. But I > think the usage guidelines are at least a good sane start, although I > agree they do not allow for more creative treatments. The policy for the > latter really is to send the example artwork to logo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > to get it approved. This is not something you can easily write > guidelines for; creative treatments I feel really need to be evaluated > on a case-by-case basis. Máirín, I remember us talking about this in the past and concluding that we should improve the guidelines to include a logo suitable for dark backgrounds. A good candidate could be the logo already located at `/usr/share/gdm/themes/Bluecurve/rh_logo-header.png`, which looks OK on dark but also on light backgrounds because of the drop shadow. I can't seem to remember receiving any replies about this issue from the people responsible for this matter and I tried to find their names/emails on the wiki (and the recipients of the `logo` email alias), but with no luck (we should really put them on the wiki). Max mentioned in his last mail that "everything in Fedora takes a long time", and we can fix this "just by continuing to push through barriers when they come up". So we have a barrier here that needs to be pushed. -d -- Dimitris Glezos Jabber ID: glezos@xxxxxxxxxx, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B http://dimitris.glezos.com/ "He who gives up functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) -- _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
