Máirín Duffy wrote:
Rahul wrote:
It should be relatively simple to file a patch against any particular
package or talk to the relevant package maintainers and release
engineering team if you need help.
I have and I've been told that package maintainers do not have final say
over what default artwork is approved for inclusion in their package.
Is not that easy like submitting a patch: consider two or more people
submitting artwork proposals for the same thing, say the GDM theme. This
is supposed to be art and the judgment is subjective, is not that easy
to say this patch is bad and this another patch is good.
There is need for leadership and a clear process.
This is supposed to be a community distribution. This includes code and
artwork, right? Or am I just being a rabble rouser here?
I think the Art project should have an internal process to select and
propose look for a certain
It's not really important to me *what* artwork gets in, quite frankly. I
think the stuff Ify and Andy have come up just within the past couple of
days is fabulous & far better than the DNA stuff I threw together. I
Parenthesis: I generally like Andy's work and I find this particular
image extremely shiny, but I don't get the metaphor.
just strongly believe that community contributions aren't taken
seriously and they should be (and by taken seriously I mean actually
used in the distro!!)
In summary, the process of getting artwork into a Fedora release *needs*
to be transparent & documented, and I think some community input needs
to be built into this process.
+10, agree completely, there is a huge need for a clear process.
--
nicu
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
_______________________________________________
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
