On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 02:46 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > > I've also posted some of the early icons in the fc5 screen setting > > [1]...those are actually cleaned up smaller icons. Is that _still_ > > bad...or maybe better? A few pixels cleaned here and there can really > > make a difference. =) > > In the very small sizes you really need a defined outline to be as > viewable as possible it really makes all the difference (and once you > have it on smaller icons it looks silly to not have it on larger ones as > they will look very different). > I vote for an outline on the smaller icons & full size ones 100%, I'm one of the these people over 40 with less than good vision even when it is corrected. > It still seems like taking a well thought out design guideline and a > very complete and well tested icon set and throwing it out. I have yet > to see any argument against Tango that didn't boil down to Fong or Duffy > plain not liking it. While that's fine I would like to see some > justification for reinventing the wheel rather than adapting Tango to > our needs. And don't say branding because that is perfectly possible > within Tango, it worked for Ubuntu why not for Fedora? Personally I like the look of the new theme aside from the lack of an outline. I like the the idea of Fedora having a unique theme and believe that Bluecurve is getting "long in the tooth" & not consistent. Regards, Paul Berger _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
