> Your statement is simply wrong. I never asked for "Tango" being adopted for > "Fedora Core" although it might be a better alterative to the aging stock > "GNOME" icons in case there doesn't exist a genuine "Fedora Core" icon for a > particular item. Moreover, I stated at various occasions based upon > objective observations in which sense the current approach appears to be > flawed to me (no outlines, low contrast, photorealistic albeit fuzzy icons > which are not suitable at smaller icon sizes, ..). It's up to the artwork > developers to draw their conclusions for further artwork development in > order to achieve the improvement that you mention below. As a matter of > fact, even the recommendation of dropping the "Echo" theme completely would > present a perfectly admissible and constructive feedback in order to > "improve" on the current state in case I thought so. ;) > Finally, feedback can only be based on the current implementation, not on > some extrapolation of how "Echo" might look some time in the future (with > the only exception of current incompleteness which had already been pointed > out by the designers). > The product is not final yet. As pointed out, there is currently no preview about the 16x16 yet. I think it is a bit premature to jump the gun. _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
