* Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>: > The docs don't warn against needing that large of a journal, yes. One > of the things which never got finished (although it was in the > original design of the jbd layer) was the ability to share the journal > across multiple filesystems. This would mean that it might more sense > to have a single large journal. Probably not 32GB in size, though. > > Did you find some documentation that actually recommend that large of > an external journal? It says the "journal has a maximum size of 128M" -- Ralf Hildebrandt Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Geschäftsbereich IT | Abt. Netzwerk Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962 Hindenburgdamm 30 | 12200 Berlin _______________________________________________ Ext3-users mailing list Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
