On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 07:45:54AM +0100, Cedric Gavage wrote: > Is there a difference in performances between a filesystem directly > created with mkfs.ext3 (with default parameters) and a "tune2fs -j" > converted filesystem from ext2 to ext3 (with default parameters). > Basically, no. You get the same journal size, and etc. > It's in a case of a filesystem with big IO usage. With tune2fs -j there is a possibility of getting a fragmented journal file if there isn't enough contingous space available on your converted filesystem. You can check it with debugfs though... _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
