I have a question about ext3 performances...
Is there a difference in performances between a filesystem directly created with mkfs.ext3 (with default parameters) and a "tune2fs -j" converted filesystem from ext2 to ext3 (with default parameters).
It's in a case of a filesystem with big IO usage.
-- -o) Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> /\\ http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com _\_v OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
_______________________________________________ Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
