chrisl@vmware.com wrote: > > Martin, > > The first patch should fix it. The bug is trigger by creating the index. > Coping out the index we assume the dirents start with the first entry > after "." "..". > > It can make the first previous deleted entry reappear. > In the past we set inode to zero for empty entry so this is not > a problem. That is not true any more. whee, neat, thanks. > Andrew, I assume touch inode->i_ctime after > ext3_mark_inode_dirty is a bug? The second patch is for that. That's correct. Could you please regenerate a full, single diff against a known kernel version? That patch generated 100% rejects for me... _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
