Re: ext3 and data=journal bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark A Basil <mbasil@alabanza.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Andrew.
> 
> Most webservers are, in fact, mostly read-only.  But these are more of a 
> complete  hosting solution, so they are web/mail/pop/sql servers.  I've run 
> about 8 different benchmarking tests, 4 per ordered/journal modes, and 
> journal wins out by far.  The times for reads/writes in journal'd mode were 
> nearly 1/4th of those in ordered.  

Ah, OK.

I assume you have experimented with large journals?  That seems to always be a
win in that sort of situation.

> Also, I was testing with the elevator settings at 
> read = 16384 and write =  8192
> 
> So,  I'm going to push for data=journal if I am positive that the sync bug had 
> been fixed.  Any ideas on that?

It's fixed.




_______________________________________________

Ext3-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users

[Index of Archives]         [Linux RAID]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Postgresql]     [Fedora]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux