On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 10:32, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 04:42, sagar tamhane wrote: > > > Can you recommend a distribution + kernel version > > which has htree implemented. > > No, and I don't expect to until htree stabilises some more --- it's > still not 100% rock-solid. Its worth noting that the first beta of the new Red Hat had htree in the kernel, but the second beta had it removed apparently due to stability issues. If you want to play with it for testing use then apply the htree patches to a recent kernel source set, but personally having put the htree patches into a test release I have backed them out at least until I think through the actual upgrade process (e2fsck required intervention as I remember - I can't do that on production upgrades - and I get nervous about anything on filesystems that has stability implications). Patches were available under http://people.redhat.com/sct/ Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@InTechnology.co.uk ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
