On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 21:14, John Vickers wrote: > Great. I guess that slightly leaves open the best policy if an > inconsistency > /is/ discovered at run-time. > > I guess I kinda want the thing to start yelling "Help! Fsck Me Now!" and > waving > a flag or something. > > But not necessarily to immediately bring down the entire system with a > panic, > since there may still be quite enough system left on other partitions to > run e2fsck. > > That seems to lead to: "error-behaviour=remount-ro". Make any sense ? Yes, that is often the best compromise between keeping the rest of the system going but taking the damaged fs out of comission. Cheers, Stephen _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
