Re: Reg: Porting UFS/VxFs to ext2 (fwd)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:05:16AM -0500, Darrell Michaud wrote:
> Perhaps an ignorant question, but can I ask why are you selecting ext2
> instead of a journalled solution? I would think that an fsck on several
> terabytes would take "a very long time".

Well, as far as the on-disk format conversion is concerned, ext2 and
ext3 look exactly the same so converting to ext2 *is* converting to
ext3 (modulo the trivial step of adding a journal inode.)

--Stephen



_______________________________________________

Ext3-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users

[Index of Archives]         [Linux RAID]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Postgresql]     [Fedora]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux