Neil Brown wrote: > > Hi all (and developers in particular) > > I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the > subject, and ends with: > "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" > > Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, > but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. > I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the reports I found were 2.4.18. > > So my question is: has this been fixed yet? > Stephen has a fix in ext3 CVS for this. I've been playing with that fix in 2.5.x. I guess we'll slot it into 2.4.20-pre. I've uploaded the diff to http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.4/2.4.19-pre8/ext3-cvs.patch (It's a `patch -p0' diff).
