--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
#include <hallo.h>
Joe Radinger wrote on Mon Feb 04, 2002 um 02:37:19PM:
> > It kind of depends on your hardware and disk usage. In many cases, howe=
ver,
> > ext3 has higher performance because it can serialize operations.
>=20
> hmm
> hardware is a p2 350 mhz with 120gb (linux) + 20gb (beos and windows
> thus not used :))), with 256 mb ram.=20
Stop! Before making comparisons, please look for the average
_throughput_. It may happen that you have the _feeling_ that the machine
is slower since _more_ data is transferred using ext3 and the CPU load
is higher.
> maybe i should try and benchmark my system. any suggestions?
Why not...
> > > i think i remember some talks about namespace-collisions.
> >=20
> > I don't recall anything like that. I've been using both ext3 and Reiser=
FS
> > since the 2.4.5 kernel. Maybe it was before that?=20
>=20
> sure it was some time ago.
The reiserfs patch for 2.2.19/20 has collitions with ext3. Not a problem
in 2.4.
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--=20
No Jolt and no Musik makes Alfie go crazy ...
-- kw in #debian.de
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8Xp7V4QZIHu3wCMURAkKvAJ0ZtY2o/NgOaFqOTKXV696BcMyV3wCfW/ux
lYMg4Z9ke3dGtIRD2ciym4o=
=eSb4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--
