RE: Dropbox dropping support for Ecryptfs!?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----Original Message-----
On Friday, August 17, 2018 14:55, Rich Wales wrote
>From Erik Soderquist:
>> Considering (in my experience) Dropbox has an unencrypted copy of your 
>> data, I would question using Dropbox for anything you would keep 
>> encrypted locally in the first place.

> FWIW, Dropbox claims that files stored on their service are encrypted.
> (https://www.dropbox.com/help/sign-in/how-security-works)

> If there is credible evidence that this is not the case, I for one would
> love to hear details.

>From that page: " Dropbox doesn't provide for client-side encryption.
Dropbox also doesn't support the creation of your own private keys."
While Dropbox may encrypt them at rest on their servers, they also
control the private keys, and so inherently have access to your files (as
would anyone who compromises Dropbox's still running servers).  While
encrypted at rest is important, it is also important to know what it
protects against.  Assuming the private keys are securely stored
_somewhere else_, encrypted at rest protects the files against someone
stealing the disc and recovering the files from the stolen disc.

They also do not provide any detail (that I found) on their private key
security, so it could be the best in the world, it could be plain text key
sitting right next to the encrypted file (making the encryption
effectively worthless in the above stolen disc scenario), or anywhere
in between.

While this is an improvement from what it was the last time I looked
into this, it is still not something I would consider for my own files.

-- Erik




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Crypto]     [Device Mapper Crypto]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux