On 5/30/16, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I contacted the LTP mailing-list on the acl_test01 issues - WIP.
>>
>> From the LTP-ML I got the impulse to test with the xattr testcase...
>>
>> root# cd /opt/ltp ; LC_ALL=C ./runltp -s xattr | tee xattr.log
>>
>> ...this fails only in the cgroup_xattr testcase.
>> [...]
>
> The test seems to try getting/setting an xattr named "trusted." (no
> suffix). That's an invalid name; such invalid names are rejected since
> commit 98e9cb571 "vfs: Distinguish between full xattr names and proper
> prefixes" (v4.5-rc1).
>
> Could you try removing that from the LTP test and rerun it?
>
AFAICS I need to re-compile...
[ testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup_xattr/cgroup_xattr.c ]
...
/* only security.* & trusted.* are valid key names */
static struct tst_key tkeys[] = {
{ .name = "security.", .good = 1, },
{ .name = "trusted.test", .good = 1, },
{ .name = "trusted.", .good = 1, }, <--- XXX:
This one only?
{ .name = "user.", .good = 0, },
{ .name = "system.", .good = 0, },
};
...
Which "trusted." line or lines shall I remove?
- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ecryptfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
