On 2015-09-15 06:36:30, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > > On 2015-09-13 14:15:21, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > Remove unneeded NULL test. > > > > > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > > > > > // <smpl> > > > @@ expression x; @@ > > > -if (x != NULL) > > > \(kmem_cache_destroy\|mempool_destroy\|dma_pool_destroy\)(x); > > > // </smpl> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I assume that you'll be landing this patch set into Linus' tree all > > together. Let me know if that's incorrect and I should take this single > > patch into the eCryptfs dev tree. > > I'm not doing anythign after this point. Some others have taken the patch > into their trees. I've taken it into my tree. Thanks again. Tyler > > julia > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Tyler > > > > > > > > --- > > > fs/ecryptfs/main.c | 3 +-- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c > > > index 4f4d047..e83f31c 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c > > > +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c > > > @@ -737,8 +737,7 @@ static void ecryptfs_free_kmem_caches(void) > > > struct ecryptfs_cache_info *info; > > > > > > info = &ecryptfs_cache_infos[i]; > > > - if (*(info->cache)) > > > - kmem_cache_destroy(*(info->cache)); > > > + kmem_cache_destroy(*(info->cache)); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ecryptfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
