On 2015-09-13 14:15:21, Julia Lawall wrote: > Remove unneeded NULL test. > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // <smpl> > @@ expression x; @@ > -if (x != NULL) > \(kmem_cache_destroy\|mempool_destroy\|dma_pool_destroy\)(x); > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I assume that you'll be landing this patch set into Linus' tree all together. Let me know if that's incorrect and I should take this single patch into the eCryptfs dev tree. Thanks! Tyler > > --- > fs/ecryptfs/main.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c > index 4f4d047..e83f31c 100644 > --- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c > +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c > @@ -737,8 +737,7 @@ static void ecryptfs_free_kmem_caches(void) > struct ecryptfs_cache_info *info; > > info = &ecryptfs_cache_infos[i]; > - if (*(info->cache)) > - kmem_cache_destroy(*(info->cache)); > + kmem_cache_destroy(*(info->cache)); > } > } > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
