[PATCH] eCryptfs: move misleading function comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
  The data encryption was moved from ecryptfs_write_end into ecryptfs_writepage,
this patch moves the corresponding function comments to be consistent with 
the modification.

Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c |    8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c b/fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c
index 6a44148..10ec695 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/mmap.c
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ struct page *ecryptfs_get_locked_page(struct inode *inode, loff_t index)
  * @page: Page that is locked before this call is made
  *
  * Returns zero on success; non-zero otherwise
+ *
+ * This is where we encrypt the data and pass the encrypted data to
+ * the lower filesystem.  In OpenPGP-compatible mode, we operate on
+ * entire underlying packets.
  */
 static int ecryptfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
@@ -481,10 +485,6 @@ int ecryptfs_write_inode_size_to_metadata(struct inode *ecryptfs_inode)
  * @copied: The amount of data copied
  * @page: The eCryptfs page
  * @fsdata: The fsdata (unused)
- *
- * This is where we encrypt the data and pass the encrypted data to
- * the lower filesystem.  In OpenPGP-compatible mode, we operate on
- * entire underlying packets.
  */
 static int ecryptfs_write_end(struct file *file,
 			struct address_space *mapping,

?韬{.n?壏煯壄?%娝?檩?w?{.n?壏瀝缉蝶?{ay?蕠跈?jf"穐殢飦?戧鐉_璁(殠娸"濟?m??G珴?⒏?櫒璀?x忈



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Crypto]     [Device Mapper Crypto]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux