On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As Linus pointed out[1], eCryptfs needs more checks around its truncate path.
> The first patch in this series makes it possible for an eCryptfs truncate
> operation to be gracefully interrupted by a fatal signal. The second adds
> checks for eCryptfs inode changes in setattr. The third is simply removal of
> an old, unused function.
Tyler, should I take these patches directly? Or are these just for
review and I should wait for a pull request?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ecryptfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
