On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 12.01.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Alex Deucher: >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Marek Olšák <maraeo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> These are libdrm_amdgpu patches harvested from an internal branch. >>> >>> The first patch is a revert I had to make to fix the build. Yeah, >>> sequence_mutex should be renamed to a more appropriate name. That can be >>> done as a follow-up. >>> >>> One notable change is the addition of DRM_IOCTL_AMDGPU_WAIT_FENCES. I >>> hope the kernel contains (or will contain) the changes too, so that I don't >>> push something that doesn't exist in the kernel. >> >> We haven't pushed DRM_IOCTL_AMDGPU_WAIT_FENCES upstream yet so I would >> hold off on any changes that depend on that. > > > Yeah, and do we really have patch #9 in our internal branch without an > Review? Cause that one breaks the API. It doesn't break the API, because the API is added by this series in an earlier patch. The API would be broken if it was changed between two libdrm versions. Marek _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
