Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Eric, > > On 1 December 2015 at 20:35, Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The user submission is basically a pointer to a command list and a >> pointer to uniforms. We copy those in to the kernel, validate and >> relocate them, and store the result in a GPU BO which we queue for >> execution. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/Makefile | 7 + >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c | 15 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h | 192 +++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c | 640 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_irq.c | 210 ++++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_packet.h | 399 ++++++++++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_render_cl.c | 631 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_trace.h | 63 +++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_trace_points.c | 14 + >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_v3d.c | 37 ++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_validate.c | 955 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/uapi/drm/vc4_drm.h | 141 +++++ >> 12 files changed, 3303 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Am I assuming correct that the above are the exact same ones copied in > mesa (and used only then simulator is used) ? In the short term > keeping the two in sync would be fine, although wondering if you have > plans to reshuffle things in the long term ? This code is not exactly synced with Mesa, but I do sync between them on a regular basis. The in-Mesa copy is secondary, and just a way for me to get testing done faster (in the simulation environment with gdb) than I can in the kernel with printfs.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
