Hi Romain,
在 08/30/2015 08:16 PM, Romain Perier 写道:
Hi,
Could you rebase your serie onto linux-next or 4.2-rc8 ? it does not
apply here...
Thanks for try to applied, and feel sorry for that failed.
This v3 series was rebased on github.com/torvalds/linux.git, so I should
rebase on kernel/next/linux-next.git when I'm preparing v4 series.
Thanks,
- Yakir
Regards,
Romain
2015-08-21 15:16 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:24:16PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
On 2015. 8. 21., at PM 7:01, Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jingoo,
在 2015/8/21 16:20, Jingoo Han 写道:
On 2015. 8. 19., at PM 11:48, Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.....
.../bindings/video/analogix_dp-rockchip.txt | 83 ++
.../devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt | 51 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 10 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 10 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 12 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts | 12 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts | 12 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 10 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 5 +
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c | 1382 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.h | 286 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_reg.c | 1294 ++++++++++++++++++
.../exynos_dp_reg.h => bridge/analogix_dp_reg.h} | 270 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig | 5 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/analogix_dp-exynos.c | 347 +++++
Would you change this file name to "exynos_dp.c"?
Sorry, I don't think so ;(
I think IP_name+Soc_name would be better in this re-use case.
So? Is there the naming rule such as "IP_name+SoC_name"?
Beside I see
there are lots of driver named with this format in kernel, such as dw_hdmi & dw_mmc
Please look at other dw cases.
For example, look at dw_pcie.
drivers/pci/host/
pcie-designware.c
pci-spear13xx.c
pci-exynos.c
In this case, pci-spear13xx.c and pci-exynos.c do not use "IP_name+SoC_name", even though these are dw IPs.
Also, naming consistency is more important.
Now, Exynos DRM files are using "exynos_drm_" prefix.
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/
exynos_drm_buf.c
exynos_drm_core.c
....
However, "analogix_dp-exynos.c" looks very inconsistent.
If there is no strict naming rule, please use "exynos_dp.c"
or "exynos_drm_dp.c".
Exynos DRM maintainers get to pick their filenames, so Yakir, please
rename as Jingoo suggested.
Even if you didn't the first thing that would go into the Exynos DRM
driver tree after this is merged is a rename patch anyway.
Thierry
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
