On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22.07.2015 16:33, Alexandr Akulich wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 17.07.2015 22:33, Alexandr Akulich wrote: >>>> As I see, this is not a kernel header, but a local (belongs to libdrm) one. >>>> (Otherwise, I would like you to point me on such file at, say, >>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/include/drm) >>> >>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h >>> >>> >>>> At files drm_sarea.h, mga_drm.h, qxl_drm.h, radeon_drm.h and via_drm.h we have >>>> >>>> #include "drm.h" >>>> >>>> At the same time, at i915_drm.h and tegra_drm.h. we have >>>> >>>> #include <drm.h> >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure that the first case is correct, because drm.h is >>>> always would be local file (in the same directory), related to >>>> amdgpu_drm.h, and that is why local include "drm.h" would be always >>>> valid. >>> >>> Makes sense to me, the patch is >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> >> Thanks! I have no write access to this fd.o repository. Can you apply it please? > > I assume your patch is against the amdgpu branch of > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/drm/, right? Only Alex Deucher has > write access to that. Well, what I can do? Alex, can you apply the patch, please? _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
