On 05/30/2015 10:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 29 May 2015 at 07:34, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 05/28/2015 10:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2015 at 00:56, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> The build error is introduced by commit fde496917682 ("Add device
>>>> enumeration interface (v4)") if don't enable udev. Can solve as check
>>>> UDEV dependency.
>>>>
>>>> CC libdrm_la-xf86drm.lo
>>>> xf86drm.c:66:21: fatal error: libudev.h: No such file or directory
>>>> #include "libudev.h"
>>>> ^
>>>> compilation terminated.
>>>> make[2]: *** [libdrm_la-xf86drm.lo] Error 1
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> xf86drm.c | 4 ++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c
>>>> index b5a174b..4a31019 100644
>>>> --- a/xf86drm.c
>>>> +++ b/xf86drm.c
>>>> @@ -63,7 +63,9 @@
>>>>
>>>> #include "xf86drm.h"
>>>> #include "libdrm_macros.h"
>>>> +#if defined(UDEV)
>>> The macro you're looking for (here and below) is #if HAVE_LIBUDEV.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure it's right using HAVE_LIBUDEV instead of UDEV because
>> currently UDEV is used from .c file but HAVE_LIBUDEV is not.
>>
> I'm afraid that I giggled a bit while I read this. Surely you know the
> difference between udev and libudev, and after a brief inspection of
> the code, original and newly added, you can see that it differs
> significantly. Additionally the newly added LIBUDEV_{CFLAGS,LIBS}
> should be a nice give-away :-)
>
Thanks for pointing that.
> That aside, I'll send a revert in a second as mentioned previously.
>
Good. Thanks.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
