On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:34:57PM +0000, Mark Zhang wrote: > I just want to make things easier. If we adding this in panel's meta > data, it will be harder to make crtc gets this, since normally encoder > talks with panel and crtc talks with encoder. But yes, adding this in > panel's metadata makes more sense so if there is a better way to do > that, I'm happy to do the changes. Adding something to the userspace ABI (which you've done here) because the kernel-internals are designed in an awkward way right now is definitely the wrong thing to do. With atomic you can easily add a bool prefer_oneshot to drm_crtc_state to encode this. But I fear that with the plain crtc helpers this just doesn't work properly. You could add a driver-private internal in drm_display_mode->private_flags, but that might clash with drivers existing use of this field. In any way, this is definitely not something to add to uapi headers. Hence Nacked-by: me. Thanks, Daniel > > Mark > ________________________________________ > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 5:27 PM > To: Mark Zhang > Cc: thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx; linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] drm: Add a new mode flag: DRM_MODE_FLAG_PREFER_ONE_SHOT > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:38:20AM +0800, Mark Zhang wrote: > > Normally this flag is set by panel driver so that crtc can enable > > the "one-shot" mode(not scan frames continuously). > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <markz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h > > index dbeba949462a..5447a338e893 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h > > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ > > #define DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_L_DEPTH_GFX_GFX_DEPTH (6<<14) > > #define DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_TOP_AND_BOTTOM (7<<14) > > #define DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_SIDE_BY_SIDE_HALF (8<<14) > > +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PREFER_ONE_SHOT (1<<19) > > tbh this doesn't sound like a mode flag, but something which should be > attached to the drm_panel. Especially since all the single-frame modes are > highly sink/link specific. Why was this added here instead of to the > drm_panel metadata? > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
