From: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:38:32 +0100 > On 19.03.2015 17:29, David Miller wrote: >> From: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:50:58 +0100 >> >>> In general I would say yes, but for this particular hardware it's a >>> bit questionable to do so. >>> >>> For radeon hardware to work correctly the CPU access to the PCIE BARs >>> should work even without using the specialized IO macros/functions, >>> otherwise mapping VRAM CPU accessible isn't really possible. >>> >>> What's the background of the change? Some problems on a certain CPU >>> platform? or just general cleanups? >> It's an _iomem_ pointer, it's not a virtual address. >> >> Therefore it is illegal to dereference the pointer. >> >> The value is opaque and has values that only make sense when used >> with the readb() et al. interfaces. >> >> This code is relying upon the fact that on x86 it happens to be >> a virtual address, but this won't work on many other architectures. > > In this case I'm perfectly fine with it and the patch is Reviewed-by: > Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > > Just wanted to make sure that you're not trying to get Radeon working > on a platform which will never really support the necessary hardware > features. I would like this to get merged via the Radeon DRM maintainer, thanks. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
