Em Fri, 06 Mar 2015 17:14:50 +0100 Kamil Debski <k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi Sean, Hans, > > I am sorry to reply so late, I was busy with other work. I am preparing the > next version > of the CEC framework and I would like to discuss your comment. I'll do a deeper review of this patch when I have some time. For now, let me add my comments about the pass-trough mode. See below. > > From: Sean Young [mailto:sean@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 12:08 PM > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Kamil Debski wrote: > > > Add the CEC framework. > > -snip- > > > +Remote control handling > > > +----------------------- > > > + > > > +The CEC framework provides two ways of handling the key messages of > > > +remote control. In the first case, the CEC framework will handle > > > +these messages and provide the keypressed via the RC framework. In > > > +the second case the messages related to the key down/up events are > > > +not parsed by the framework and are passed to the userspace as raw > > messages. > > > + > > > +Switching between these modes is done with a special ioctl. > > > + > > > +#define CEC_G_KEY_PASSTHROUGH _IOR('a', 10, __u8) > > > +#define CEC_S_KEY_PASSTHROUGH _IOW('a', 11, __u8) > > > +#define CEC_KEY_PASSTHROUGH_DISABLE 0 > > > +#define CEC_KEY_PASSTHROUGH_ENABLE 1 > > > > This is ugly. This ioctl stops keypresses from going to rc-core. The > > cec device is still registered with rc-core but no keys will be passed > > to it. > > This could also be handled by loading an empty keymap; this way the > > input layer will still receive scancodes but no keypresses. > > I see here a few options that can be done: > > 1) Remove the past through option altogether > I think I would opt for leaving it. There should be some mode that would > enable > raw access to the CEC bus. Maybe it should be something more like a > promiscuous mode > in Wi-Fi networks. What do you think? Sean, Hans? > > 2) Leave the pass through mode, but without disabling passing the keyup/down > events to > the RC framework. This way an application could capture all messages, but > the input device > would not be crippled in any way. The problem with this solution is that key > presses could > be accounted twice. > > 3) As you suggested - load an empty keymap whenever the pass through mode is > enabled. > I am not that familiar with the RC core. Is there a simple way to switch to > an empty map > from the kernel? There is the ir_setkeytable function, but it is static in > rc-main.c, so it > cannot be used in other kernel modules. Any hints, Sean? > > 4) Remove the input device whenever a pass through mode is enabled. This is > an alternative to > the solution number 3. I think it would not be great, because a > /dev/input/event* that appears > and disappears could be confusing. (4) doesn't seem nice. I don't think that the driver itself should cleanup the keymap. This is something that the userspace app(s) should explicitly request. With regards to the "raw" mode, the RC core currently has two ways to send/receive raw data: 1) Via LIRC. This needs to be extended to pass scancodes, as, currently, it sends/receive pulses. We need such extension for other usages, anyway, so adding it makes sense. 2) The input layer actually provide several types of events on a key press. One of such events carry on the scancode: 1425828993.018962: event type EV_KEY(0x01) key_down: KEY_VOLUMEDOWN(0x0001) 1425828993.018962: event type EV_SYN(0x00). 1425828993.131823: event type EV_KEY(0x01) key_up: KEY_VOLUMEDOWN(0x0001) 1425828993.131823: event type EV_MSC(0x04): scancode = 0x1e 1425828993.131823: event type EV_SYN(0x00). The EV_KEY events has the Linux Keycode, plus the info if the key was pressed or released, while the EV_MSC has the scancode. So, I'm not seeing much usage of a pass-through mode, as, even without LIRC, the userspace could simply cleanup the key map, and listen to EV_MSC: $ sudo ir-keytable -c -t Old keytable cleared Testing events. Please, press CTRL-C to abort. 1425829137.721737: event type EV_MSC(0x04): scancode = 0x1b 1425829137.721737: event type EV_SYN(0x00). 1425829139.318249: event type EV_MSC(0x04): scancode = 0x18 1425829139.318249: event type EV_SYN(0x00). ... Yet, the best would be for the application is to setup the key map it needs, and just use the standard Linux way: wait for EV_KEY events. Regards, Mauro > > > > > > +static ssize_t cec_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, > > > + size_t sz, loff_t *off) > > > +{ > > > + struct cec_devnode *cecdev = cec_devnode_data(filp); > > > + > > > + if (!cec_devnode_is_registered(cecdev)) > > > + return -EIO; > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static ssize_t cec_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, > > > + size_t sz, loff_t *off) > > > +{ > > > + struct cec_devnode *cecdev = cec_devnode_data(filp); > > > + > > > + if (!cec_devnode_is_registered(cecdev)) > > > + return -EIO; > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > > Both read and write do nothing; they should either -ENOSYS or the > > fuctions should be removed. > > > > I agree, I removed this for the next version. > > Best wishes, _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
