Comment # 35
on bug 89034
from smoki
Created attachment 113809 [details] subreg_disabled.txt (In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #34) > > I can't reproduce random failures with glsl-fs-min nor any piglit > regressions with sub-register liveness enabled, but sub-register liveness > doesn't seem to result in any code difference for glsl-fs-min anyway. > I can't too if i run it alone, so there is no difference, it just fail sometimes in full piglit run. > > Can you find another test which consistently passes without sub-register > liveness and fails with it *and* shows a difference between them in the > R600_DEBUG=vs,ps stderr output, and attach the latter for both cases? As i said yesterday comment 33 i trimmed down only ones which shows this regression, you can pick any of those 136 test which shows difference. Let say: R600_DEBUG=vs,ps ./bin/copy-pixels -samples=8 -auto Outputs attached, first without...
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
