Comment # 34
on bug 89034
from Michel Dänzer
(In reply to smoki from comment #33) > glsl-fs-min is one of the random failing tests actually, it sometimes pass > sometimes fail with or without subreg liveness, so that is not problem here > i think. I can't reproduce random failures with glsl-fs-min nor any piglit regressions with sub-register liveness enabled, but sub-register liveness doesn't seem to result in any code difference for glsl-fs-min anyway. Can you find another test which consistently passes without sub-register liveness and fails with it *and* shows a difference between them in the R600_DEBUG=vs,ps stderr output, and attach the latter for both cases?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
